LUCKY. ?
Ever since my first bet, in late 1940s I have watched with interest gamblers who could beat the percentages,imposed against them.by the UK Boookmakers.
The massive %, deductons made winning a very difficult transaction, the very fact that only a handful of greats, are writen in the history books proves the point, that backing horses for a living is not easy.
Many attempted to beat the system by Chickanary, Fraud, or Strokes, and history also confirms that although there were many who attempted the black art, very few got paid after there well thought out plans. punters like, Alex Bird a 1940/80 Levethian, was an obvious winner, and we can assume most of his winnings was from hard work, beavering away on the form book. but that isnt the whole story of Alex,s success. a very big % of his winnings was on photo finishes, in a period when the time taken to confirm the result was not much better than Boots are today.
Bird admited when the betting tax on turnover was introduced that it was the end of his punting, and even when the first deduction was only 2% he cut back. as much as 75% of his betting. but even when he was flying he still found it most difficult to get on.
Bookmakers have always controlled there own destiny by restrictions, and there is nothing wrong with that policy, it is a ballancing act, between offers and exceptance.
The old Dear John letters from the Bookmakers head office a thing of the past, replaced with software that just hinders any wager being placed by a winning client, without actually giving you the proverbial Ticket.
Bookmakers however have been given the red light to expand in both telephone, credit, and internet, the new Gambling Laws both conducive with grouth. Gambling Debt recovery now statatary., that has tilted the game in favour of the Bookmakers.even more so than before.
So with this in mind I wasnt surprised when a high stret Bookmaker , sent out a very strong Dear John Internet, informing one of there clients that if he attempted to set foot in any of there shops, he would be escorted off, and any bets, placed by him or any friend or relations bets would be voided.
I assume that the punter, who is at the moment, going through an IBAS dispute with the firm, for several thousand pounds, is a marked man.
This type of behavour by UK Bookmakers is certainly not new, but not to this extream,bets have always been refused, sometimes because they are to large or because the offer is no longer available but I have never known, a case were Nevada, Maffia, restrictions are muted.
To be called into the back office of the Belagio, Las Vagas, and offered the Pent house free for a week confirms that you are a loser.
Big Winners, are paid out with pomp and glory, but those Gamblers who have discovered an Edge, will receive, a firm warning not to attend the Casino again, the card counters of a few years ago. were invited into the back room of the majority of Casinos, and sometimes the warnings were not much removed from a talking to by Bugsie Segal.
But 2007 in Leafie Britian, I am shocked. after all the punter is no card counter, he certainly is no strokester, or con man, all his bets, are well thought out, ligitamate wagers, if the Bookmaker offers a concesion so good that the punter sees an edge then what is wrong, for it is the very thing that all punters strive for.
Lucky15 the individual who is coming in for specialist treatment, is an old fashioned gambler, similar to Alex Bird, a great thinker a great figeurs man, who can calculate the odds, in his head no nead for a computor, to show him were it is.
2 years ago there was a complete change in the UK Betting Scene, the introduction of internet made it easier for a firm to bet to a wider international market, 24 hours a day, the many events, were a market was offered made it more dificult to keep a ballance of events taking place second by second. TV coverage from all round the world also made it an accute service, ball by ball, in running markets, exiting, oportunities, drove the industry and certainly sports betting skiwards.
Exchange Betting opened up many golden opportunites for non gamblers to trade or arb, % profit from differing odds, the game was now wide open to thinkers, movers and shakers, in some cases leaving the old fashioned punters behind.
But are the UK Bookmakers staff, up to the changes, or are they being out manouvered by people like Lucky15.
I personally dont think there are many as astute as this middle aged, ex accountant.
In the High Streets there has always been indipendants, competing with the big three for the UK Gambling Pound, and all prepared to look for a publicity push, inviting the more informed gambler, to participate in the offers.
Fred Done the 4th Bigest Bookmaker in the UK was the first to realy, extend concessions, in a big way, offering Bonus,s on all combination bets, these wagers the bread and butter, of the old fashioned, Honest Joe, gauranteeing massive profits.
To back a winner not easy to back 6 winners in a heinze 57, impossible.
Fred made his bones, on the Publicity, of BONUS KING FRED.
He pushed the boat out massivly with variable Bonus,s making it foolish for any UK punter to place a combination bet without consulting Fred.first.
Many of the copy cats, and that included the Big Three, offered extentions on all returns on these bets, it was then that Lucky15 saw the massive advanteges, being offered. it was in the wording of the terms,
Taking for granted the fact that 6 winners was nie impossible, all Bookmakers were content to offer a massive % if the lucky punter. succeeded.
Detorie Day gave this type of bet, a massive boost. with many bred and butter punters hitting the jackpot.
Fred made good use of the publicity. increasing many of his punters returns, massivly.
But whilst many of the high street Bookmakers jumping on Freds Band Wagon, this punting great, saw the Black Hole, within the Bonus.rules themselves.
The word was Returns, Bonus on Returns.
Lucky 15, realised that at certain times a year in Tennis, or World Cup, Rugby, early matches were non competative,
With some teams as near a certanty as possible.
By placing 6 of these teams, in a Hienze 57 or lucky 63, he could receive a BONUS on his stake, so it was just a matter of getting as much on as possible and allow the Bookmaker to pay out according to his own rules.
Some Bookmakers saw the implications from day one paying out like all honest Bookmakers ussually do, altering the terms to read, Bonus on Winnings.for future bets.
Some not so shrewed, still offering the Bonus on Returns, to this day.
I doubt that the change to high street rules on Bonus,s will have very little effect on the massive winnings that this man generates, yearly as he informs me that many other oportunities occure.
I cant waite for this man to tell his Story of how he beat the system, even the Hole in One Winners, of a few years ago, would give this man much respect as a massive winner, who does so without reverting to chickanary.
And long may thinkers, last, the old enermy have all the moves covered so when they fail to do so. now and again. best wishes to the person who saw the chance.
Cubone.
